Schlesier, H., Schäfer, M., & Desing, H. (2024).
Measuring the Doughnut: A good life for all is possible within planetary boundaries.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 141447.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141447The safe and just operating space postulates that it is possible to simultaneously stay within ecological limits and fulfill basic needs. However, evidence that such a state can be achieved given existing population and available technologies is lacking. Here, we attempt to show whether a safe and just space exists by modelling material and energy requirements for satisfying basic needs with various technological scenarios. Environmental impacts of a basket of products representing basic needs satisfaction are measured through life cycle analysis and compared to planetary boundaries for the first time. We find that all planetary boundaries considered can be respected for 8.0 and 10.4 billion people with a probability of 81% and 73% respectively. However, this requires a fossil-free energy system, and an essentially vegan diet as well as no additional cropland conversion.
Hachtmann, M. (2024).
Linking sufficiency and the protection of biodiversity: An issue of political implications, framing, descriptiveness and interdisciplinarity? Nature Conservation, 55, 83–102.
https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.55.118243The dramatic loss of biodiversity is caused by the use of resources and land. One strategy aiming at reducing the use of resources and land is sufficiency, which consequently could be a strategy for protecting biodiversity. This article therefore examines the extent to which sufficiency in the context of biodiversity conservation is already being addressed by nature conservation associations and the scientific community. To this end, publications were analysed firstly with regards to the understanding of sufficiency, secondly with regards to the considered links between sufficiency and biodiversity as well as thirdly with regards to the considered fields of action.
Creutzig, F., Roy, J., & Minx, J. (2024).
Demand-side climate change mitigation: Where do we stand and where do we go? Environmental Research Letters, 19(4), 040201.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad33d3We provide an overview of an unique set of 22 review papers published in the focus issue of Environmental Research Letters. We also extract a key set of insights, ranging from the varied but rapidly evolving literature to demand-side mitigation potential, relevance for well-being, and consistent categorization of options across end-use sectors. We find that demand-side approaches to climate change mitigation supplement exclusively technology-focused supply side solutions and, in many cases, comprise system-wide effect contributing to well-being and planetary stability. Review studies cover macro-economics, well-being, and sustainable development goals on the metric side, and investigate consumption-based individual options, urban strategies, transport, building, and food sector potentials, but also the role of the circular economy, material efficiency, and digitalization.
Mamut, P. (2023).
Sufficiency – an emerging discourse? At the crossroads of mainstreaming and transformation (1st edition).
Nomos.
This book argues that while there is scholarly agreement on the relevance of sufficiency as a sustainability principle, there is no consensus about its precise contribution to change. Using discourse analysis, the author shows that sufficiency is also charged with multiple meanings in the context of the practices used in energy and climate model regions. It criticises the fact that the most common interpretation of sufficiency is also the one with the weakest transformative potential and shows how this untapped potential can be unleashed.
Gurtner, L. M., & Moser, S. (2024).
The where, how, and who of mitigating climate change: A targeted research agenda for psychology. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 94, 102250.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102250In this article, we invert the current logic of applying psychological theories to mitigate climate change. Instead, we begin by identifying the social change strategies capable of mitigating climate change, such as social tipping dynamics, and then highlight the corresponding knowledge that psychology must create to support and accelerate these dynamics. We suggest that psychology can help to answer the question of “Where to?” – i.e. the direction we should head for sustainability – by identifying the feasibility of consumption corridors. Next, psychology can help to answer the question of “How do we get there?” by producing more knowledge about human capacity for change. Finally, psychology can help to answer the question of “Who will get us there?” by exploring the motivations of three key social groups: activists, experienced individuals, and the affluent.
Jackson, T., Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2024).
Confronting the dilemma of growth. A response to Warlenius (2023). Ecological Economics, 220, 108089.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108089This commentary responds to a recent article in this journal purporting to identify the ‘limits to degrowth’. We first clarify and set in context the tensions between growth rates and decoupling rates on which the argument is based. In particular, we show how failing to achieve sufficient decoupling appears to leave society torn between missing our climate targets and crashing our economies. This dilemma highlights the tough choices inherent in the climate transition. But it does not imply that critics of growth endorse economic collapse. On the contrary, the intention of postgrowth scholars is clearly to prevent this collapse by offering structural and social reforms, alongside technological options, as a way of meeting climate targets.
Nathan, H. S. K., Amarayil Sreeraman, B., Hari, L., & Bhattacharjee, S. B. (2024).
Towards operationalizing sufficiency. Journal of Indian Business Research, 16(1), 1–7.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-03-2024-386The papers included in this special issue represent several avenues for operationalizing sufficiency. The common message of these papers is that walking faster does not help if we are walking in the wrong direction (Potocink, 2018). Although the notion of sufficiency is not new (Princen, 2005; Thomas et al., 2015), its applications are too few, particularly in developing countries like India. This special issue fills this gap and is a much-needed contribution to bring about the desired paradigm shift in economies toward sufficiency.